Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US

Belarus
709.2 current US$ per person
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
282.66 current US$ per person
in 2025
Belarus rank
42nd
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
42nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time

  • Belarus
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0200400600800198120032025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 709.2 current US$ per person against 282.66 current US$ per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 426.54 current US$ per person.

That makes Belarus's figure about 2.5 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 42nd and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd of 204 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1990s 259.6 current US$ per person 117.6 current US$ per person 142.01 current US$ per person Belarus
2000s 277.8 current US$ per person 129.65 current US$ per person 148.15 current US$ per person Belarus
2010s 482.2 current US$ per person 203.24 current US$ per person 278.96 current US$ per person Belarus
2020s 582.63 current US$ per person 248.63 current US$ per person 334.01 current US$ per person Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, Belarus or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Belarus, at 709.2 current US$ per person against 282.66 current US$ per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
426.54 current US$ per person, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
Belarus ranks 42nd and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/belarus/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/belarus/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.