Denmark vs Mauritania: Agriculture (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Agriculture (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Denmark
- Mauritania
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 7,020 million SLC against 3,849 million SLC in Mauritania, a difference of 3,171 million SLC.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.8 times Mauritania's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 39th and Mauritania ranks 42nd of 84 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,485 million SLC | 1,136 million SLC | 2,349 million SLC | Denmark |
| 2020s | 6,052 million SLC | 2,965 million SLC | 3,087 million SLC | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Denmark or Mauritania?
- Denmark, at 7,020 million SLC against 3,849 million SLC in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Denmark and Mauritania?
- 3,171 million SLC, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Mauritania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Mauritania rank globally for agriculture (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Denmark ranks 39th and Mauritania ranks 42nd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.