Land locked developing countries vs T�rkiye: Agricultural tractors, total — Import Value

Land locked developing countries
128,909 1000 USD
in 2009
T�rkiye
163,095 1000 USD
in 2008
Land locked developing countries rank
2nd
T�rkiye rank
22nd

Agricultural tractors, total — Import Value over time

  • Land locked developing countries
  • T�rkiye
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119852009

How they compare

T�rkiye currently reports 163,095 1000 USD against 128,909 1000 USD in Land locked developing countries, a difference of 34,186 1000 USD.

That makes T�rkiye's figure about 1.3 times Land locked developing countries's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land locked developing countries ahead.

Land locked developing countries ranks 2nd and T�rkiye ranks 22nd of 17 regions.

Across the 5 decades both report, Land locked developing countries averaged higher in 4 and T�rkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land locked developing countries T�rkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 9,667 1000 USD 3,473 1000 USD 6,194 1000 USD Land locked developing countries
1970s 40,597 1000 USD 61,338 1000 USD 20,741 1000 USD T�rkiye
1980s 69,222 1000 USD 33,303 1000 USD 35,919 1000 USD Land locked developing countries
1990s 127,085 1000 USD 25,446 1000 USD 101,639 1000 USD Land locked developing countries
2000s 243,048 1000 USD 94,635 1000 USD 148,413 1000 USD Land locked developing countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural tractors, total — import value, Land locked developing countries or T�rkiye?
T�rkiye, at 163,095 1000 USD against 128,909 1000 USD in Land locked developing countries as of 2008.
What is the difference in agricultural tractors, total — import value between Land locked developing countries and T�rkiye?
34,186 1000 USD, with T�rkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land locked developing countries and T�rkiye?
48 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2008.
How do Land locked developing countries and T�rkiye rank globally for agricultural tractors, total — import value?
Land locked developing countries ranks 2nd and T�rkiye ranks 22nd of 17 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural tractors, total — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land locked developing countries vs T�rkiye: Agricultural tractors, total — Import Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-tractors-total-import-value/land-locked-developing-countries/t-rkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-tractors-total-import-value/land-locked-developing-countries/t-rkiye/">Land locked developing countries vs T�rkiye: Agricultural tractors, total — Import Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural tractors, total — Import Value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 10,164 data points, 1961–2009
Last refreshed

Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.