Estonia vs Libya: Agricultural tractors — In Use
Agricultural tractors — In Use over time
- Estonia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 39,733 No against 33,744 No in Estonia, a difference of 5,989 No.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 61st and Libya ranks 59th of 189 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50,005 No | 36,691 No | 13,314 No | Estonia |
| 2000s | 50,624 No | 39,733 No | 10,891 No | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural tractors — in use, Estonia or Libya?
- Libya, at 39,733 No against 33,744 No in Estonia as of 2000.
- What is the difference in agricultural tractors — in use between Estonia and Libya?
- 5,989 No, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Libya?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2000.
- How do Estonia and Libya rank globally for agricultural tractors — in use?
- Estonia ranks 61st and Libya ranks 59th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural tractors — In Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.