Chile vs Latvia: Agricultural tractors — In Use
Agricultural tractors — In Use over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 59,562 No against 53,915 No in Chile, a difference of 5,647 No.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Chile ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 50th of 193 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46,447 No | 56,665 No | 10,218 No | Latvia |
| 2000s | 53,841 No | 56,555 No | 2,714 No | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural tractors — in use, Chile or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 59,562 No against 53,915 No in Chile as of 2007.
- What is the difference in agricultural tractors — in use between Chile and Latvia?
- 5,647 No, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2007.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for agricultural tractors — in use?
- Chile ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 50th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural tractors — In Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.