Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Agricultural Researchers (FTE) — Government, Higher Education and

Argentina
6,041 No
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand
10,234 No
in 2023
Argentina rank
9th
Australia and New Zealand rank
6th

Agricultural Researchers (FTE) — Government, Higher Education and over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia and New Zealand
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k200420132023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 10,234 No against 6,041 No in Argentina, a difference of 4,193 No.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times Argentina's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 9th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th of 104 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 3,621 No 7,700 No 4,079 No Australia and New Zealand
2010s 4,993 No 9,818 No 4,825 No Australia and New Zealand
2020s 5,928 No 10,716 No 4,788 No Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural researchers (fte) — government, higher education and, Argentina or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 10,234 No against 6,041 No in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural researchers (fte) — government, higher education and between Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
4,193 No, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for agricultural researchers (fte) — government, higher education and?
Argentina ranks 9th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th of 104 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Researchers (FTE) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Agricultural Researchers (FTE) — Government, Higher Education and. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-researchers-fte-total-total-government-higher-education-and-private-non/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-researchers-fte-total-total-government-higher-education-and-private-non/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/">Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Agricultural Researchers (FTE) — Government, Higher Education and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Researchers (FTE) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
129 places, 1,898 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The ASTI Researchers Dataset provides indicators on human resources engaged in agricultural research and development (R&D) at the national level. Data are compiled from the human resources section of the ASTI questionnaire and presented in full-time equivalent (FTE) researchers to reflect the effective research effort devoted to agricultural R&D, using information on time allocation. The dataset disseminates two indicators: total agricultural researchers (FTE) and agricultural researchers (FTE) per 100 000 agricultural workers, the latter calculated using employment in agriculture data sourced from FAOSTAT to support cross-country comparability of research intensity.