New Caledonia vs United States: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP

New Caledonia
0.0124 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
United States
0.0126 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
133rd
United States rank
132nd

Agricultural output, per unit of GDP over time

  • New Caledonia
  • United States
00.250.50.751196119922024

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.0126 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0124 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0002 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 133rd and United States ranks 132nd of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and United States in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia United States Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7881 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.211 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5771 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1970s 0.2113 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.131 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0803 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1980s 0.136 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0595 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0765 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1990s 0.0346 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0367 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0021 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP United States
2000s 0.0149 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0252 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0103 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP United States
2010s 0.0099 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0196 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0098 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP United States
2020s 0.0109 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0146 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0036 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per unit of gdp, New Caledonia or United States?
United States, at 0.0126 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0124 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per unit of gdp between New Caledonia and United States?
0.0002 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and United States?
60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and United States rank globally for agricultural output, per unit of gdp?
New Caledonia ranks 133rd and United States ranks 132nd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs United States: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/united-states/">New Caledonia vs United States: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,457 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.