New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP

New Caledonia
0.0124 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0.0137 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
133rd
Saudi Arabia rank
130th

Agricultural output, per unit of GDP over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Saudi Arabia
00.250.50.751196119922024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0137 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0124 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0013 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 133rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 130th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7881 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4066 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3815 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1970s 0.2113 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1199 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0914 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1980s 0.136 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0461 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.09 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1990s 0.0346 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.055 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0204 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.0149 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0372 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0223 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.0099 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0161 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0062 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.0109 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0169 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.006 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per unit of gdp, New Caledonia or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.0137 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0124 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per unit of gdp between New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia?
0.0013 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for agricultural output, per unit of gdp?
New Caledonia ranks 133rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 130th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/saudi-arabia/">New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,457 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.