What is the difference in agricultural output, per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Namibia?

0.0007 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Namibia: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP

Mauritius

0.024 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Namibia

0.0233 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Mauritius rank

111th

Namibia rank

112th

Agricultural output, per unit of GDP over time

Mauritius
Namibia

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.024 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0233 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0.0007 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 112th of 158 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.2352 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0861 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1491 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
1990s	0.0985 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0602 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0383 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
2000s	0.061 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0501 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0109 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
2010s	0.0294 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0253 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0042 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
2020s	0.0264 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0268 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0005 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per unit of gdp, Mauritius or Namibia?: Mauritius, at 0.024 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0233 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Namibia?: 0.0007 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for agricultural output, per unit of gdp?: Mauritius ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 112th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Namibia: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/namibia/">Mauritius vs Namibia: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 158 places, 8,457 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Agricultural output divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.