Equatorial Guinea vs Finland: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP

Equatorial Guinea
0.0107 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Finland
0.0101 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
140th
Finland rank
141st

Agricultural output, per unit of GDP over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Finland
01234196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0107 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0101 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP in Finland, a difference of 0.0006 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Finland ranks 141st of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 3.12 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3641 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.76 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1970s 1.32 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1655 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.15 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1980s 1.48 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0523 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.42 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.6182 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0258 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5923 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0361 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0176 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0185 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.009 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0123 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Finland
2020s 0.0119 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0109 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.001 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per unit of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Finland?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0107 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0101 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per unit of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Finland?
0.0006 constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Finland?
60 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Finland rank globally for agricultural output, per unit of gdp?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Finland ranks 141st of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Finland: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/finland/">Equatorial Guinea vs Finland: Agricultural output, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,457 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.