Mozambique vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agricultural output, per capita

Mozambique
237.79 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
256.37 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person
in 2024
Mozambique rank
129th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
127th

Agricultural output, per capita over time

  • Mozambique
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0100200300196119922024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 256.37 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person against 237.79 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person in Mozambique, a difference of 18.58 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 129th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 127th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 195.26 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 150.02 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 45.24 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person Mozambique
1970s 186.83 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 193.92 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 7.09 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 146.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 221.08 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 74.38 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 164.63 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 214.04 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 49.41 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 176.79 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 146.12 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 30.68 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person Mozambique
2010s 190.94 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 232.21 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 41.28 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 234.6 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 254.54 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person 19.94 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per capita, Mozambique or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 256.37 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person against 237.79 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per capita between Mozambique and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
18.58 constant 2014-2016 US$ per person, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mozambique and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for agricultural output, per capita?
Mozambique ranks 129th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 127th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agricultural output, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-capita/mozambique/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-capita/mozambique/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Mozambique vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agricultural output, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per capita
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 9,038 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.