Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Agricultural output

Equatorial Guinea
141.53 million constant 2014-2016 US$
in 2024
New Caledonia
106.39 million constant 2014-2016 US$
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
144th
New Caledonia rank
147th

Agricultural output over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • New Caledonia
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 141.53 million constant 2014-2016 US$ against 106.39 million constant 2014-2016 US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 35.14 million constant 2014-2016 US$.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 144th and New Caledonia ranks 147th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 173.33 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 146.42 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 26.91 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Equatorial Guinea
1970s 96.34 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 128.37 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 32.03 million constant 2014-2016 US$ New Caledonia
1980s 86.22 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 148.40 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 62.18 million constant 2014-2016 US$ New Caledonia
1990s 102.89 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 105.77 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 2.88 million constant 2014-2016 US$ New Caledonia
2000s 116.51 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 79.79 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 36.72 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Equatorial Guinea
2010s 136.58 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 93.72 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 42.86 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Equatorial Guinea
2020s 141.56 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 103.44 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 38.12 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, Equatorial Guinea or New Caledonia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 141.53 million constant 2014-2016 US$ against 106.39 million constant 2014-2016 US$ in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural output between Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia?
35.14 million constant 2014-2016 US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia rank globally for agricultural output?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 144th and New Caledonia ranks 147th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Agricultural output. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Agricultural output. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-dollars/equatorial-guinea/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-dollars/equatorial-guinea/new-caledonia/">Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Agricultural output</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
159 places, 9,102 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Total agricultural output is the sum of crop and livestock products. This data is expressed in US dollars. It is adjusted for inflation but does not account for differences in living costs between countries.