Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Agricultural output

Cape Verde
153.52 million constant 2014-2016 US$
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
141.53 million constant 2014-2016 US$
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
143rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
144th

Agricultural output over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Equatorial Guinea
50.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M196119922024

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 153.52 million constant 2014-2016 US$ against 141.53 million constant 2014-2016 US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 11.99 million constant 2014-2016 US$.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 143rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 144th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 88.14 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 173.33 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 85.19 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Equatorial Guinea
1970s 59.04 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 96.34 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 37.30 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Equatorial Guinea
1980s 110.37 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 86.22 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 24.15 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Cape Verde
1990s 151.93 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 102.89 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 49.05 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Cape Verde
2000s 226.66 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 116.51 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 110.15 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Cape Verde
2010s 223.60 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 136.58 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 87.02 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Cape Verde
2020s 165.15 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 141.56 million constant 2014-2016 US$ 23.60 million constant 2014-2016 US$ Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
Cape Verde, at 153.52 million constant 2014-2016 US$ against 141.53 million constant 2014-2016 US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural output between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
11.99 million constant 2014-2016 US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for agricultural output?
Cape Verde ranks 143rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 144th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Agricultural output. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Agricultural output. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-dollars/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-dollars/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/">Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Agricultural output</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
159 places, 9,102 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Total agricultural output is the sum of crop and livestock products. This data is expressed in US dollars. It is adjusted for inflation but does not account for differences in living costs between countries.