What is the difference in agricultural land use, per square kilometre between Malta and Nepal?

0.21 hectares per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Nepal: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre

Malta

25.91 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Nepal

26.12 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Malta rank

135th

Nepal rank

133rd

Agricultural land use, per square kilometre over time

Malta
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 26.12 hectares per square kilometre against 25.91 hectares per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.21 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 135th and Nepal ranks 133rd of 209 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	47.22 hectares per square kilometre	24.89 hectares per square kilometre	22.34 hectares per square kilometre	Malta
1970s	43.12 hectares per square kilometre	27.53 hectares per square kilometre	15.59 hectares per square kilometre	Malta
1980s	40.62 hectares per square kilometre	28.8 hectares per square kilometre	11.83 hectares per square kilometre	Malta
1990s	35.94 hectares per square kilometre	29.28 hectares per square kilometre	6.66 hectares per square kilometre	Malta
2000s	29.97 hectares per square kilometre	29.33 hectares per square kilometre	0.6425 hectares per square kilometre	Malta
2010s	32.24 hectares per square kilometre	27.95 hectares per square kilometre	4.29 hectares per square kilometre	Malta
2020s	27.27 hectares per square kilometre	26.27 hectares per square kilometre	1 hectares per square kilometre	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per square kilometre, Malta or Nepal?: Nepal, at 26.12 hectares per square kilometre against 25.91 hectares per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per square kilometre between Malta and Nepal?: 0.21 hectares per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Nepal rank globally for agricultural land use, per square kilometre?: Malta ranks 135th and Nepal ranks 133rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Nepal: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/malta/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/malta/nepal/">Malta vs Nepal: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 209 places, 12,060 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.