Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre

Kiribati
41.98 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
41.79 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
91st
Zimbabwe rank
93rd

Agricultural land use, per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Zimbabwe
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 41.98 hectares per square kilometre against 41.79 hectares per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.19 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 91st and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 209 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 49.93 hectares per square kilometre 26.61 hectares per square kilometre 23.32 hectares per square kilometre Kiribati
1970s 46.91 hectares per square kilometre 28.98 hectares per square kilometre 17.94 hectares per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 47.65 hectares per square kilometre 31.86 hectares per square kilometre 15.79 hectares per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 45.68 hectares per square kilometre 35.55 hectares per square kilometre 10.13 hectares per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 41.98 hectares per square kilometre 40.94 hectares per square kilometre 1.03 hectares per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 41.98 hectares per square kilometre 41.86 hectares per square kilometre 0.1156 hectares per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 41.98 hectares per square kilometre 41.8 hectares per square kilometre 0.1715 hectares per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per square kilometre, Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
Kiribati, at 41.98 hectares per square kilometre against 41.79 hectares per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per square kilometre between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
0.19 hectares per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for agricultural land use, per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 91st and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/zimbabwe/">Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural land use, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 12,060 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.