Cuba vs Sudan: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre
Cuba
61.67 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
60.31 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
36th
Sudan rank
38th
Agricultural land use, per square kilometre over time
- Cuba
- Sudan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 61.67 hectares per square kilometre against 60.31 hectares per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 1.36 hectares per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 36th and Sudan ranks 38th of 209 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 60.52 hectares per square kilometre | 59.95 hectares per square kilometre | 0.5682 hectares per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2020s | 61.67 hectares per square kilometre | 60.31 hectares per square kilometre | 1.35 hectares per square kilometre | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural land use, per square kilometre, Cuba or Sudan?
- Cuba, at 61.67 hectares per square kilometre against 60.31 hectares per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agricultural land use, per square kilometre between Cuba and Sudan?
- 1.36 hectares per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Sudan rank globally for agricultural land use, per square kilometre?
- Cuba ranks 36th and Sudan ranks 38th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.