Democratic Republic of Congo vs South Korea: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
15.48 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea
16.07 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
164th
South Korea rank
163rd

Agricultural land use, per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • South Korea
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 16.07 hectares per square kilometre against 15.48 hectares per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.59 hectares per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 164th and South Korea ranks 163rd of 209 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 11.1 hectares per square kilometre 23.15 hectares per square kilometre 12.05 hectares per square kilometre South Korea
1970s 11.26 hectares per square kilometre 23.59 hectares per square kilometre 12.33 hectares per square kilometre South Korea
1980s 11.41 hectares per square kilometre 23.08 hectares per square kilometre 11.68 hectares per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 11.4 hectares per square kilometre 21.41 hectares per square kilometre 10.01 hectares per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 11.34 hectares per square kilometre 19.44 hectares per square kilometre 8.1 hectares per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 14.05 hectares per square kilometre 17.7 hectares per square kilometre 3.65 hectares per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 15.17 hectares per square kilometre 16.33 hectares per square kilometre 1.16 hectares per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or South Korea?
South Korea, at 16.07 hectares per square kilometre against 15.48 hectares per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and South Korea?
0.59 hectares per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and South Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and South Korea rank globally for agricultural land use, per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 164th and South Korea ranks 163rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs South Korea: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/korea-rep/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs South Korea: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural land use, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 12,060 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.