Aruba vs New Caledonia: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre

Aruba
11.11 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
10.07 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
174th
New Caledonia rank
177th

Agricultural land use, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • New Caledonia
051015196119922023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 11.11 hectares per square kilometre against 10.07 hectares per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.04 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Aruba ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 177th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 11.11 hectares per square kilometre 14.33 hectares per square kilometre 3.22 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 11.11 hectares per square kilometre 14.45 hectares per square kilometre 3.34 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 11.11 hectares per square kilometre 14.52 hectares per square kilometre 3.41 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 11.11 hectares per square kilometre 12.81 hectares per square kilometre 1.7 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 11.11 hectares per square kilometre 12.65 hectares per square kilometre 1.54 hectares per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 11.11 hectares per square kilometre 10.18 hectares per square kilometre 0.9331 hectares per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 11.11 hectares per square kilometre 10.07 hectares per square kilometre 1.04 hectares per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per square kilometre, Aruba or New Caledonia?
Aruba, at 11.11 hectares per square kilometre against 10.07 hectares per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per square kilometre between Aruba and New Caledonia?
1.04 hectares per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and New Caledonia rank globally for agricultural land use, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 177th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs New Caledonia: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/aruba/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/aruba/new-caledonia/">Aruba vs New Caledonia: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural land use, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 12,060 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.