Antigua and Barbuda vs North Korea: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
20.45 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea
21.55 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
148th
North Korea rank
145th

Agricultural land use, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • North Korea
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

North Korea currently reports 21.55 hectares per square kilometre against 20.45 hectares per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 1.1 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes North Korea's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 148th and North Korea ranks 145th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and North Korea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda North Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 20.71 hectares per square kilometre 18.5 hectares per square kilometre 2.21 hectares per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 20.68 hectares per square kilometre 19.09 hectares per square kilometre 1.59 hectares per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 20.45 hectares per square kilometre 20.59 hectares per square kilometre 0.131 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 20.45 hectares per square kilometre 21.12 hectares per square kilometre 0.6646 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 20.45 hectares per square kilometre 21.4 hectares per square kilometre 0.9494 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
2010s 20.45 hectares per square kilometre 21.78 hectares per square kilometre 1.32 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
2020s 20.45 hectares per square kilometre 21.56 hectares per square kilometre 1.1 hectares per square kilometre North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or North Korea?
North Korea, at 21.55 hectares per square kilometre against 20.45 hectares per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and North Korea?
1.1 hectares per square kilometre, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and North Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and North Korea rank globally for agricultural land use, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 148th and North Korea ranks 145th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs North Korea: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Antigua and Barbuda vs North Korea: Agricultural land use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural land use, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 12,060 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.