What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank

31st

Zimbabwe rank

32nd

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 9.4 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 47 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	South Asia (IDA & IBRD)	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/">South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.