What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Lower middle income and Zambia?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Zambia?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lower middle income vs Zambia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Lower middle income

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Zambia

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Lower middle income rank

17th

Zambia rank

18th

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Lower middle income
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 7.1 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Lower middle income ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 18th of 47 groups.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Lower middle income	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zambia
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zambia
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zambia
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zambia
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zambia
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zambia
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Lower middle income or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Lower middle income and Zambia?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Zambia?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lower middle income and Zambia rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Lower middle income ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 18th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Zambia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/zambia/">Lower middle income vs Zambia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.