What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Liberia and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Liberia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Liberia vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Liberia

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Liberia rank

33rd

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank

31st

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Liberia
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Liberia's figure about 9.1 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.

Liberia ranks 33rd and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 31st of 207 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Liberia	South Asia (IDA & IBRD)	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Liberia
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Liberia
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Liberia
1990s	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Liberia
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Liberia
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Liberia
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Liberia or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: Liberia, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Liberia and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Liberia and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Liberia ranks 33rd and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 31st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/liberia/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/liberia/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Liberia vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.