What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Least developed countries and Mongolia?

0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Mongolia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Mongolia?

44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Least developed countries vs Mongolia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Least developed countries

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Mongolia

0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Least developed countries rank

4th

Mongolia rank

1st

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Least developed countries
Mongolia

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 9.3 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 4th and Mongolia ranks 1st of 47 groups.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Least developed countries	Mongolia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0005 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0004 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Mongolia
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Mongolia
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0006 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0006 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Mongolia
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Mongolia
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Least developed countries or Mongolia?: Mongolia, at 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Least developed countries and Mongolia?: 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Mongolia?: 44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Mongolia rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Least developed countries ranks 4th and Mongolia ranks 1st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Mongolia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mongolia/">Least developed countries vs Mongolia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.