Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Jordan or New Caledonia?

New Caledonia, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Jordan as of 2023.

What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Jordan and New Caledonia?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Caledonia?

59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Jordan vs New Caledonia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Jordan

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

New Caledonia

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Jordan rank

141st

New Caledonia rank

140th

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Jordan
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Jordan, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 141st and New Caledonia ranks 140th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 6 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Jordan	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Jordan
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Jordan
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Jordan
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Jordan
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Jordan
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Jordan or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Jordan and New Caledonia?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Caledonia?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Jordan and New Caledonia rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Jordan ranks 141st and New Caledonia ranks 140th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs New Caledonia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/jordan/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/jordan/new-caledonia/">Jordan vs New Caledonia: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.