Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Guinea-Bissau or World?

Guinea-Bissau, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in World as of 2023.

What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Guinea-Bissau and World?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and World?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea-Bissau vs World: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Guinea-Bissau

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

World

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Guinea-Bissau rank

36th

World rank

33rd

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Guinea-Bissau
World

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in World, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 9.1 times World's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 36th and World ranks 33rd of 207 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea-Bissau	World	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Guinea-Bissau
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Guinea-Bissau
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Guinea-Bissau
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Guinea-Bissau
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Guinea-Bissau
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Guinea-Bissau or World?: Guinea-Bissau, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Guinea-Bissau and World?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and World?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and World rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Guinea-Bissau ranks 36th and World ranks 33rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs World: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea-bissau/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea-bissau/world/">Guinea-Bissau vs World: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.