What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia and Uganda?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Uganda?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Europe & Central Asia vs Uganda: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Uganda

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Europe & Central Asia rank

39th

Uganda rank

42nd

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Europe & Central Asia
Uganda

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Uganda's figure about 10.3 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 39th and Uganda ranks 42nd of 47 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Europe & Central Asia	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia or Uganda?: Uganda, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia and Uganda?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Uganda?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Uganda rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Europe & Central Asia ranks 39th and Uganda ranks 42nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Uganda: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/uganda/">Europe & Central Asia vs Uganda: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.