What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

East Asia & Pacific rank

35th

Zimbabwe rank

32nd

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

East Asia & Pacific
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 12.4 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 47 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	East Asia & Pacific	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: East Asia & Pacific ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/zimbabwe/">East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.