What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific and Libya?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Libya?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

East Asia & Pacific vs Libya: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Libya

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

East Asia & Pacific rank

35th

Libya rank

38th

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

East Asia & Pacific
Libya

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Libya's figure about 9.6 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 35th and Libya ranks 38th of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	East Asia & Pacific	Libya	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Libya
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	East Asia & Pacific
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Libya
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Libya
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Libya
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Libya
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific or Libya?: Libya, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific and Libya?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Libya?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Libya rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: East Asia & Pacific ranks 35th and Libya ranks 38th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Libya: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/libya/">East Asia & Pacific vs Libya: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.