East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0 sq. km per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
0 sq. km per US$ of GDP
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
36th
Guinea-Bissau rank
36th

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Guinea-Bissau
00000196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 11.4 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 36th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 36th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau?
0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 36th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 36th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guinea-bissau/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit
sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.