What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Congo and Latin America & Caribbean?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latin America & Caribbean?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Latin America & Caribbean: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Congo

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Latin America & Caribbean

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Congo rank

23rd

Latin America & Caribbean rank

21st

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Congo
Latin America & Caribbean

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Congo's figure about 7.3 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 23rd and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 21st of 207 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Latin America & Caribbean	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0005 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0005 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Congo
1970s	0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Congo
1980s	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Congo
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Congo
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Congo
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Congo
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Congo or Latin America & Caribbean?: Congo, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Congo and Latin America & Caribbean?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latin America & Caribbean?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Latin America & Caribbean rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Congo ranks 23rd and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 21st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Latin America & Caribbean: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/latin-america-and-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/latin-america-and-caribbean/">Congo vs Latin America & Caribbean: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.