Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?

Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Aruba as of 2023.

What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Aruba

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Turks and Caicos Islands

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Aruba rank

199th

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

198th

Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Aruba
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Aruba, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 199th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 198th of 207 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	Turks and Caicos Islands	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Aruba ranks 199th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 198th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/aruba/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/aruba/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 13,849 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.