New Caledonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.1007 sq. km per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.1053 sq. km per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
178th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
176th

Agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.1053 sq. km per square kilometre against 0.1007 sq. km per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0046 sq. km per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 178th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 176th of 210 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1433 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1906 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0473 sq. km per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.1445 sq. km per square kilometre 0.2049 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0603 sq. km per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.1452 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1538 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0086 sq. km per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.1281 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1476 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0195 sq. km per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.1265 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1115 sq. km per square kilometre 0.015 sq. km per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.1018 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1053 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0035 sq. km per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.1007 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1053 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0046 sq. km per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.1053 sq. km per square kilometre against 0.1007 sq. km per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0046 sq. km per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 178th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 176th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-sq-km-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/trinidad-and-tobago/">New Caledonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural land (sq. km), per square kilometre
Unit
sq. km per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 15,143 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural land (sq. km) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.