What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Malta and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Turks and Caicos Islands?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Malta

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Turks and Caicos Islands

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malta rank

183rd

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

180th

Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Malta
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 2.3 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Malta ranks 183rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 180th of 188 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Turks and Caicos Islands	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Malta or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Malta and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Malta and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Malta ranks 183rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Malta vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Agricultural area over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.