Democratic Republic of Congo vs Tanzania: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania
0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
29th
Tanzania rank
27th

Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Tanzania
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196019922025

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Tanzania ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 29th and Tanzania ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0065 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0072 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1970s 0.003 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.006 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.003 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1980s 0.0027 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.003 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1990s 0.0038 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0041 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2000s 0.0021 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Democratic Republic of Congo or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania?
0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania rank globally for agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 29th and Tanzania ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Tanzania: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/tanzania/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Tanzania: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agricultural area over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.