What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal?

36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nepal: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Nepal

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

80th

Nepal rank

79th

Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nepal ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 80th and Nepal ranks 79th of 188 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2000s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2010s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2020s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal?: 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal rank globally for agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 80th and Nepal ranks 79th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nepal: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/nepal/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nepal: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Agricultural area over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.