What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with North Macedonia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?

36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Azerbaijan vs North Macedonia: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Azerbaijan

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

North Macedonia

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Azerbaijan rank

85th

North Macedonia rank

84th

Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Azerbaijan
North Macedonia

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 85th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Azerbaijan	North Macedonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0024 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0021 hectares per US$ of GDP	Azerbaijan
2000s	0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	Azerbaijan
2010s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	North Macedonia
2020s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Azerbaijan or North Macedonia?: North Macedonia, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Azerbaijan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?: 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Azerbaijan and North Macedonia rank globally for agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Azerbaijan ranks 85th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs North Macedonia: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/azerbaijan/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/azerbaijan/north-macedonia/">Azerbaijan vs North Macedonia: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Agricultural area over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.