What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per capita between Guatemala and United Kingdom?

0.0114 hectares per person, with Guatemala ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and United Kingdom?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs United Kingdom: Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita

Guatemala

0.2498 hectares per person

in 2025

United Kingdom

0.2384 hectares per person

in 2025

Guatemala rank

120th

United Kingdom rank

122nd

Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita over time

Guatemala
United Kingdom

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.2498 hectares per person against 0.2384 hectares per person in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0114 hectares per person.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 120th and United Kingdom ranks 122nd of 189 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.5824 hectares per person	0.3633 hectares per person	0.2191 hectares per person	Guatemala
1970s	0.4784 hectares per person	0.3321 hectares per person	0.1463 hectares per person	Guatemala
1980s	0.4618 hectares per person	0.3228 hectares per person	0.139 hectares per person	Guatemala
1990s	0.4407 hectares per person	0.3047 hectares per person	0.136 hectares per person	Guatemala
2000s	0.3596 hectares per person	0.2855 hectares per person	0.0741 hectares per person	Guatemala
2010s	0.2785 hectares per person	0.2668 hectares per person	0.0117 hectares per person	Guatemala
2020s	0.2574 hectares per person	0.2483 hectares per person	0.0092 hectares per person	Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural area over the long-term, per capita, Guatemala or United Kingdom?: Guatemala, at 0.2498 hectares per person against 0.2384 hectares per person in United Kingdom as of 2025.
What is the difference in agricultural area over the long-term, per capita between Guatemala and United Kingdom?: 0.0114 hectares per person, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and United Kingdom?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and United Kingdom rank globally for agricultural area over the long-term, per capita?: Guatemala ranks 120th and United Kingdom ranks 122nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs United Kingdom: Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-capita/guatemala/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-area-over-the-long-term-per-capita/guatemala/united-kingdom/">Guatemala vs United Kingdom: Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 12,474 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Agricultural area over the long-term divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.