United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Yugoslav SFR: Abaca — Other uses

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0 t
in 2013
Yugoslav SFR
0 t
in 1991
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
11th
Yugoslav SFR rank
11th

Abaca — Other uses over time

  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Yugoslav SFR
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119872013

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 31 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 11th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 66 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 14,289 t 457.22 t 13,832 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1970s 9,099 t 116.7 t 8,982 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1980s 10,304 t 24.5 t 10,280 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1990s 10,870 t 0 t 10,870 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca — other uses, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or Yugoslav SFR?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 0 t against 0 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2013.
What is the difference in abaca — other uses between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Yugoslav SFR?
0 t, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Yugoslav SFR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for abaca — other uses?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 11th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Yugoslav SFR: Abaca — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-other-uses-non-food/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-other-uses-non-food/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/yugoslav-sfr/">United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Yugoslav SFR: Abaca — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Abaca — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 5,004 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.