Jordan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Abaca — Other uses

Jordan
0 t
in 2013
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0 t
in 2013
Jordan rank
11th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
11th

Abaca — Other uses over time

  • Jordan
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119872013

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0 t against 0 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 53 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 11th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 11th of 66 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 14,289 t 14,289 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1970s 0 t 9,099 t 9,099 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1980s 4 t 10,304 t 10,300 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1990s 2 t 12,687 t 12,685 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2000s 0 t 10,619 t 10,619 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca — other uses, Jordan or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Jordan, at 0 t against 0 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2013.
What is the difference in abaca — other uses between Jordan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0 t, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Jordan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for abaca — other uses?
Jordan ranks 11th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 11th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Abaca — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-other-uses-non-food/jordan/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-other-uses-non-food/jordan/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Jordan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Abaca — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Abaca — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 5,004 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.