Central Asia vs Kenya: Abaca — Other uses
Abaca — Other uses over time
- Central Asia
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 50 t against 0 t in Central Asia, a difference of 50 t.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 13th and Kenya ranks 7th of 28 groups.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.75 t | 42.25 t | 39.5 t | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0 t | 38.3 t | 38.3 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0 t | 44.25 t | 44.25 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher abaca — other uses, Central Asia or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 50 t against 0 t in Central Asia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in abaca — other uses between Central Asia and Kenya?
- 50 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Kenya?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Central Asia and Kenya rank globally for abaca — other uses?
- Central Asia ranks 13th and Kenya ranks 7th of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.