What is the difference in abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?

1,369 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?

10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

1 t

in 2023

United Republic of Tanzania

-1,368 t

in 2019

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank

2nd

United Republic of Tanzania rank

5th

Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals over time

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
United Republic of Tanzania

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1 t against -1,368 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1,369 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 20 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?: Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1 t against -1,368 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?: 1,369 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals?: Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-manila-hemp-raw-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-manila-hemp-raw-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 52 places, 639 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.