Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Nigeria: Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1 t
in 2023
Nigeria
0 t
in 2018
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
1st
Nigeria rank
3rd
Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Nigeria
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Nigeria, a difference of 1 t.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and Nigeria ranks 3rd of 5 groups.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Nigeria?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1 t against 0 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nigeria?
- 1 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nigeria?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nigeria rank globally for abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and Nigeria ranks 3rd of 5 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.