Argentina vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals
Argentina
0 t
in 2017
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1 t
in 2023
Argentina rank
3rd
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
1st
Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals over time
- Argentina
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Argentina, a difference of 1 t.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 3rd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st of 26 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals, Argentina or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1 t against 0 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals between Argentina and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- 1 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Argentina and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for abaca, manila hemp, raw — residuals?
- Argentina ranks 3rd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.