China vs Eswatini: Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Import quantity

China
1.54 t
in 2023
Eswatini
0.68 t
in 2023
China rank
15th
Eswatini rank
18th

Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Import quantity over time

  • China
  • Eswatini
05001.0k1.5k201020162023

How they compare

China currently reports 1.54 t against 0.68 t in Eswatini, a difference of 0.86 t.

That makes China's figure about 2.3 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.

China ranks 15th and Eswatini ranks 18th of 23 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Eswatini Difference Ahead
2010s 233.74 t 0.2525 t 233.49 t China
2020s 26.91 t 0.5133 t 26.39 t China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca, manila hemp, raw — import quantity, China or Eswatini?
China, at 1.54 t against 0.68 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in abaca, manila hemp, raw — import quantity between China and Eswatini?
0.86 t, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?
11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do China and Eswatini rank globally for abaca, manila hemp, raw — import quantity?
China ranks 15th and Eswatini ranks 18th of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Abaca, manila hemp, raw — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
44 places, 449 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.