Lao People's Democratic Republic vs United States of America: 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures
2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 0.37 against 0.11 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.26.
That makes United States of America's figure about 3.4 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 14th and United States of America ranks 16th of 19 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.06 | 0.6989 | 0.6389 | United States of America |
| 2010s | 0.087 | 0.436 | 0.349 | United States of America |
| 2020s | 0.155 | 0.5175 | 0.3625 | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures, Lao People's Democratic Republic or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 0.37 against 0.11 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures between Lao People's Democratic Republic and United States of America?
- 0.26, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and United States of America?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and United States of America rank globally for 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 14th and United States of America ranks 16th of 19 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.