Guatemala vs Myanmar: 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures

Guatemala
0.16
in 2024
Myanmar
0.15
in 2020
Guatemala rank
128th
Myanmar rank
130th

2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures over time

  • Guatemala
  • Myanmar
0.10.150.20.25200120122024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.16 against 0.15 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.01.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Myanmar ahead.

Guatemala ranks 128th and Myanmar ranks 130th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Myanmar Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2244 0.2 0.0244 Guatemala
2010s 0.179 0.171 0.008 Guatemala
2020s 0.08 0.15 0.07 Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures, Guatemala or Myanmar?
Guatemala, at 0.16 against 0.15 in Myanmar as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures between Guatemala and Myanmar?
0.01, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Myanmar?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Myanmar rank globally for 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures?
Guatemala ranks 128th and Myanmar ranks 130th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Myanmar: 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/2-a-1-agriculture-orientation-index-for-government-expenditures-value/guatemala/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/2-a-1-agriculture-orientation-index-for-government-expenditures-value/guatemala/myanmar/">Guatemala vs Myanmar: 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures — Value
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 4,886 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.