Guatemala vs Upper-middle-income economies: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)

Guatemala
52.2 %
in 2024
Upper-middle-income economies
12.5 %
in 2024
Guatemala rank
25th
Upper-middle-income economies rank
28th

2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Upper-middle-income economies
102030405060201520192024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 52.2 % against 12.5 % in Upper-middle-income economies, a difference of 39.7 %.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 4.2 times Upper-middle-income economies's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 25th and Upper-middle-income economies ranks 28th of 121 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Upper-middle-income economies Difference Ahead
2010s 48.38 % 14.2 % 34.18 % Guatemala
2020s 57.1 % 14.1 % 43 % Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old), Guatemala or Upper-middle-income economies?
Guatemala, at 52.2 % against 12.5 % in Upper-middle-income economies as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) between Guatemala and Upper-middle-income economies?
39.7 %, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Upper-middle-income economies?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Upper-middle-income economies rank globally for 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)?
Guatemala ranks 25th and Upper-middle-income economies ranks 28th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Upper-middle-income economies: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/2-1-2-prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-15-years-old-and-over-no-breakdown-2/guatemala/upper-middle-income-economies/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/2-1-2-prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-15-years-old-and-over-no-breakdown-2/guatemala/upper-middle-income-economies/">Guatemala vs Upper-middle-income economies: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 1,581 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.