Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: 2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (male)
2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (male) over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 226,378 1000 No against 10,693 1000 No in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 215,685 1000 No.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 21.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 32 groups.
Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 152,463 1000 No | 7,839 1000 No | 144,623 1000 No | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 205,624 1000 No | 10,112 1000 No | 195,512 1000 No | Sub-Saharan Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (male), Sub-Saharan Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Sub-Saharan Africa, at 226,378 1000 No against 10,693 1000 No in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (male) between Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 215,685 1000 No, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (male)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (male) (15 years old and over) — Confidence interval: Lower bound. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.